Contemporaries and Peers<\/strong><\/p>\n Frank Costin [1920 -1995] and his Designs for Lotus<\/strong><\/p>\n Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n In this article we examine the work of Frank Costin and describe his work for Colin Chapman and Lotus. Frank Costin was a good applied engineer and extrapolated technologies in particular materials and aerodynamic principles from aircraft where he started his career. Its possible that some of his major designs might have been inspired by the Mosquito and Comet which was under development at the time when he worked for de Havilland.<\/p>\n He quoted<\/p>\n \u201cApplied aerodynamics is a combination of knowing physical laws, a great deal of experience and the right feel\u201d<\/p>\n Frank Albert Costin was born on the 8th June 1920 in London. He was the first of four children .He was always very close to his brother Mike. In later life both brothers would be associated with Colin Chapman. [Mike would become famous for his partnership with Kith Duckworth forming Cosworth Engineering]<\/p>\n Frank had a \u201cgift for acute observation, quick analysis and remarkable understanding\u201d<\/p>\n Like Chapman he had a streak of non-conformity whilst aspiring to academic excellence. Frank preferred applied engineering where he could engage both hands and mind and have total responsibility.<\/p>\n From our analysis it will be evident that Costin’s ideas were extremely forward thinking particularly in the area of petrol \/ fuel efficiency extracted through aerodynamic design. His concepts and principles live on and in may respects have been copied or inspirational in many modern day city car designs. Frank Costin possibly did not get all the credit he deserved. It\u2019s hoped that this article will provide a perspective.<\/p>\n This article will be used as focus for a more detailed analysis of aerodynamic principles to follow.<\/p>\n Frank Costin: CV<\/strong><\/p>\n Frank Costin was a gifted versatile engineer, thinker and industrial designer specialising in aerodynamics. He was also a cultivated man and competent musician and composer. As a young man he was a talented athlete [swimming] Like Chapman he enjoyed flying, gliding, sailing and with friends built a glider called Condor c 1949.His close friends included Ron Clear, Bert Parslow and Peter Davis. He started early working as an aircraft fitter but soon found promotion. By 1951 he was Flight Test Engineer [in charge of the Experimental Dept] at de Havilland and promoted in 1953 to Engineer in Charge [Aerodynamic Flight Test Dept; Chester]<\/p>\n His career included employment with:<\/p>\n His design work included:<\/p>\n Costin Designs Explained<\/strong><\/p>\n The Marcos GT. [1959]<\/strong><\/p>\n This small sports car was the first to be built with laminated 1\/8\u201d marine plywood and spruce bonded with synthetic glue monococque chassis. The concept was inherently strong and comprised three torsion boxes running long ways and three across the car. These were linked together by he stressed floor. Also in wood were the boot and doors. It\u2019s possible that it might have been partly inspired by the Mosquito aircraft of the Second World War. Strength and lightness were primary considerations. The Amigo [1968]<\/strong><\/p>\n This sports car was based on the plywood monococque chassis with glass fibre outer skin. The basic chassis was similar in principle to the Marcos GT. It is estimated the Amigo chassis weighed 187 lbs. The mechanical parts were from the Vauxhall VX 4\/90 Victor or SL 1975 cc engine [96bhp -108 estimated]. As standard the engine was canted over which contributed to the low bonnet line. Lotus Designs<\/strong><\/p>\n The Lotus Mk. VIII etc<\/strong><\/p>\n A fundamental principle of aerodynamics is that there is a correlation between resistance speed and power. In the early Lotus trial cars with their low speed there was little requirement for drag reduction however this changed when circuit racing was entered. These were translated into detailed design and incorporated:<\/p>\n The overall design was based around the major mechanical parameters, suspension movement etc. The completed body was 156\u201d long x 55\u2019wide x32 high at scuttle. The car weighted 10.25 cwt [approximately weights and measures] As a suggestion of the aerodynamic performance the editor quotes from a John Bolster road test. [Note the Mk.VIII was fitted with a M.G. 1467 cc engine equipped with Laystall alloy cylinder head. Estimated output of 85 bhp at 6200 rpm.]<\/p>\n Max speed: 121mph The Mk.VIII had some defects and these were amended in the MK IX. [1955]<\/strong> Costin made the body:<\/p>\n At Le Mans the Mk.IX is believed to have reached approximately 130mph on the Mulsane straight. The Mk.IX was both a commercial and competition success. It used a variety of engines including he Coventry Climax and M.G.<\/p>\n <\/strong>Lotus Eleven [1956]<\/strong><\/p>\n The Eleven was a logical development of the Mk.VIII &IX. There was a new space frame and the swing axle was lowered. Costin\u2019s design for the Eleven included;<\/p>\n The Autocar Road Test of Nov.1956 recorded the following data [1100cc engine] Le Mans speeds at Mulsane: The Lotus Elite [1957]<\/strong><\/p>\n The Elite was born as Chapman\u2019s attempt to enter a new league of production sports car. This was probably driven by considerations of financial security, cash flow for the GP racing programme, a response to a new 1300 CT category of racing and a genuine desire to evolve into a more sophisticated and advanced car production.<\/p>\n Chapman set the main parameters and criteria; mechanical specification and suspension.<\/p>\n The body design resulted from an interchange of ideas and practicality between Chapman, Frayling, Cambridge, Hickman and Kirwan-Taylor. Significantly and ambitiously the chassis and body were to be monocque construction.<\/p>\n Aerodynamic refinements that Costin introduced were probably more considerable than admitted and included:<\/p>\n On completion Costin projected that the Elite\u2019s CD would be near 0.30.In 1962 at MIRA it was measured at 0.336<\/p>\n The Elite was an aesthetic masterpiece. Reference:<\/p>\n Flying on Four Wheels Fast Cars
\nFrank Costin made a significant contribution to Lotus at a time when the application of his scientific principles allied to Chapman\u2019s chassis and suspension design helped compensate for the less powerful engines available to Lotus.<\/p>\n
\nReaders will also be aware of the significance of aerodynamics in current FI. Costin and Chapman were not the first but applied critical analysis and were committed protagonists.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\nIts believed the first prototype was registered DFF 529 and powered by an 1172cc Ford side valve engine. Costin designed the suspension based on Triumph Herald components. The coupe design incorporated a fixed roof and gull wing doors and by practical necessity a fairly crude windscreen and side screens. The overall weight is thought to between 8cwt- 9.75 cwt approximately.
\nFrank Costin joined in partnership with Jem Marsh [Speedex Castings and Accessories] and Peter and Dennis Adams to construct the car. Costin formed the Monocoque Chassis and Body Co and started assembly in North Wales.
\nThe name Marcos was a derivative of surnames.<\/p>\n
\nThe car as expected was very low and long [13\u2019-7\u201dx 5\u201d-5\u201d wide approx] and aerodynamic with a distinctive Kamm tail and flying buttress from the rear of the cabin. The windscreen was flush fitted .The efficiency of the body allowed performance figures of 130 mph, 0-60 in 7.2 seconds and 30mpg at 60mph approximately. The seats were of curved plywood.
\nThe car was expensive. \u00a33,326 in 1970. It had some very attractive practical features but also some significant drawbacks. It required development.<\/p>\n
\nWhen Chapman decided to compete in International level racing he realised that he would be forced into some practical concessions particularly around engine performance and that these would need compensation. To be successful both handling and aerodynamics would have to be superior to the opposition. Also the open wheel cars were prohibited by the regulations.
\nGreat care in design and execution were required as streamlined bodies also increased weight and required additional breaking and cooling as a result of the additional speeds they achieved.
\nMike Costin introduced his brother Frank to Colin Chapman c 1954 and they collaborated on the Lotus Mk.VIII.
\nCostin\u2019s primary design objectives were:<\/p>\n\n
\n
\nCostin conducted scientific tests to compare the actual performance with his theoretical calculations. There are a series of photographs at disused aerodrome where the experiments were conducted. In one Costin strapped himself to the car to observe airflow.
\nThe experiments involved a pressure head and additional readings were recorded on instruments comprising altimeters, air speed indicators and vertical speed indicators.<\/p>\n
\n0-60=8 seconds
\n0-100=23.8 \u201c
\nStanding quarter mile =15.5 \u201c
\nEstimated fuel consumption =30mpg.<\/p>\n\n
\nChapman insured the lowest and most practical frontal area was achieved by canting the Coventry climax engine over. This could be cared through to the scuttle.<\/p>\n\n
\nMax speed: 111.75mph
\n0-60mph: 10.9 sec
\n0-100mph: 38.9\u201d
\nStanding quarter mile: 17.9\u201d
\nOverall fuel consumption 47.8mpg. Kerb weight 9.1cwt approx
\nApprox measurements:
\nWheel base 7\u2019-1\u201d
\nFront track: 3\u2019-10. 5\u201d
\nRear track: 11\u2019-2\u201d
\nOverall width: 5\u2019-00\u201d<\/p>\n
\n1500cc: 128.2mph
\n1100cc:119.44mph<\/p>\n\n
\nApprox: Weights and measures:
\nLength: 148\u201d
\nWidth: 59:
\nHeight 46.5\u201d
\nWeight: 1484 lbs<\/p>\n
\nDennis Ortenburger.
\nPatrick Stephens 1986
\nISBN:0850597706<\/p>\n
\nGiles Chapman
\nWH Smith\/ Sutton Publishing 2003
\nISBN: 0750935081<\/p>\n