\nPorsche<\/td>\n | 908 Spyder<\/td>\n | 2997<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n 1963 Alpine M63<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nSpecification<\/td>\n | Alpine sports Racing Prototype<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nEngine \/Cyli<\/td>\n | Renault 4 cylinder, water cooled<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nBore \/Stroke<\/td>\n | 71.5 x 62 mm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nCC<\/td>\n | 996 cc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nValve Gear<\/td>\n | 2x ohc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nComp Ratio<\/td>\n | n\/a<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nCarburettors<\/td>\n | 2 x Weber<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nMax.Power<\/td>\n | 100 bhp at 7,800 rpm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nTrans\/Gears<\/td>\n | 5-speed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Brakes<\/td>\n | Girling Disc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Brakes<\/td>\n | Girling Disc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSteering<\/td>\n | Rack and pinion<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Susp’<\/td>\n | wishbone and coilsprungs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Susp’<\/td>\n | wishbone and coilsprungs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nChassis<\/td>\n | multi-tubular<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nWheel base<\/td>\n | 7ft-8in<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Track<\/td>\n | 4ft-3.25in<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Track<\/td>\n | 4ft-3in<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nO’length<\/td>\n | 13ft-5in<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nO’width.body<\/td>\n | 4ft-10in<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nKerb weight<\/td>\n | 1,350 lb<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Tyres<\/td>\n | 5.00 x 13in<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Tyres<\/td>\n | 5.50 x 13in<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n The Lotus 47: Context and Lotus evolution\/development; Lotus Development Time Line<\/strong><\/p>\nThe types 47 &62 have an interesting connectivity going back through the Europa.<\/p>\n In our dedicated articles relating to Europa and The GKN 47 D Rover V8 we record that as early as 1963 Chapman was considering a family\/range of cars that could have been tightly structured offering economy of manufacturing.<\/p>\n Ron Hickman and John Frayling contributed significantly to these.<\/p>\n We suggest that the types 47 &62 be explored partly in this context.<\/p>\n \n\n\nYear<\/td>\n | Type No<\/td>\n | Function<\/td>\n | Name<\/td>\n | Engine<\/td>\n | Designers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1957-63<\/td>\n | 14<\/td>\n | Prod \u2018sports car<\/td>\n | Elite<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1962-66<\/td>\n | 26<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | Elan [S1]<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1963<\/td>\n | 29<\/td>\n | Indianapolis<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | Ford V8<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1964<\/td>\n | 30<\/td>\n | Sports racing<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | Ford V8<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1964<\/td>\n | 34<\/td>\n | Indianapolis<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | Ford V8<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1965<\/td>\n | 36<\/td>\n | Prod \u2018sports car<\/td>\n | Elan [S2]<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1965<\/td>\n | 38<\/td>\n | Indianapolis<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | Ford V8<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1965<\/td>\n | 40<\/td>\n | Sports racing<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | Ford V8<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1966<\/td>\n | 42<\/td>\n | Indianapolis<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | Ford V8<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1966-68<\/td>\n | 46<\/td>\n | Prod \u2018sports car<\/td>\n | Europa [S1]<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1966<\/td>\n | 47<\/td>\n | Sports racing<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nc1966<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | One off<\/td>\n | Europa [S1] base<\/td>\n | Rover V8<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n1969<\/td>\n | 62<\/strong><\/td>\nSports racing prototype<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n Figure 1.Track Test from A&R<\/p>\n Form and function<\/strong><\/p>\nThe type 47 brew out of the Europa which itself had an essentially race bred layout.<\/p>\n The 47 was adapted for racing as per usual weight saving was a major consideration.<\/p>\n The snorkel feeding the induction were a distinctive feature, rather prominent above the engine deck but also in line with F1 practice. [Rather different to that of the Lotus Mk.III.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Figure 2.Editors sketch of the Lotus 47 with “snorkel”<\/p>\n The Lotus 47 states Crombac:-<\/p>\n \u201cAs was usually the case with new Lotus models, a racing programme for the Europa was set in motion with a special batch of cars built by Lotus Components, all equipped with twin cam engines. This \u201cracing\u201d Europa \u2013the Lotus 47 made its debut at the 1966 Brands Hatch Boxing Day meeting when in the hands of John Miles\u2026\u2026\u2026.it won the prototype class in a race for sports cars \u201c<\/p>\n Harvey echoes these sentiments:-<\/p>\n \u201cat the same time, a competition version was built to publize the Europa and provide some competition for the mid-engine Ginetta which was starting to take over the Elan\u2019s class in GT racing; and at the same time, giving Lotus Components something to sell in place of the out moded 26R.this was the type 47 which was first raced on Boxing Day 1966.\u201d<\/p>\n Harvey<\/p>\n Provides an excellent technical description of the 47.<\/p>\n This includes:-<\/p>\n \n- Twin fuel tanks were mounted on either side of the engine bay bat the front with separate collector tank underneath<\/li>\n
- Cosworth engine with dry-sump<\/li>\n
- Knock off peg drive magnesium spoked wheels with 7.5 and 10.5 inch rims [front back] increasing to 8.5 \/12 inch<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The 47 was outwardly similar but intended for competition with 1.6 litres of fuel-injected Ford \u2013Cosworth to give an adequate 160 bhp, transmitted through a five speed gearbox\u2026.<\/p>\n The 47 became familiar and successful, in the colours of Lotus Components, Gold Leaf and private owners, a T62 derivative, with substantially different body, was raced by Gold Leaf Team Lotus, but was generally less widely seen as Lotus\u2019 racing was concentrated on Formula 1.\u201d<\/p>\n Type 47 Cutaways Drawings<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Figure 4.Editors sketch of Lotus 47.<\/p>\n The 47: Outclassed<\/strong><\/p>\nTwite makes the simple observation:-<\/p>\n \u201cOutside Britain the Lotus Europa 47 [including the 47|, with slightly revised suspension geometry and bodywork] has had little success. The main reason is that most sports car races have 2 \u2013litre class not 1600 cc and the Lotus needed that extra 400 cc worth of power to be competitive. Some private owners fitted 2-litre Coventry Climax four cylinder engines, but no notable success was obtained\u201d<\/p>\n Nb to comprehend this see tabulation of contemporaries above.<\/p>\n <\/strong><\/p>\nFigure 5.Editors sketch of the Lotus twin cam installed in Lotus 47<\/p>\n Production Volumes and retail <\/strong><\/p>\nThe editors have seen various numbers quoted from 30 to 55<\/p>\n The retail price of the type 47 was c \u00a31,500.<\/p>\n Not a massive amount but sufficient to promote the Europa.<\/p>\n The type 47 deserved its own dedicated sales brochure, the A&R have an example.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Figure 3.Sales brochure fromA&R<\/p>\n The Lotus 62<\/strong><\/p>\nSubscribers might like to see our dedicated article with illustrations.<\/p>\n Comparative Analysis and Specification within the Group<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nSpecification<\/strong><\/td>\nLotus Type 47<\/strong><\/td>\nLotus Type 62<\/strong><\/td>\nChevron-BMW B8<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nEngine \/Cyli<\/strong><\/td>\nFord : Four cylinder, water cooled<\/td>\n | Four cylinder water cooled<\/td>\n | BMW four cylinder water cooled<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nBore \/Stroke<\/strong><\/td>\n83.5 x 72.7 mm<\/td>\n | 95.3 x 69.9 mm<\/td>\n | 89 x 79.9 mm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nCC<\/strong><\/td>\n1,594 cc<\/td>\n | 1,992 cc<\/td>\n | 1,990 cc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nValve Gear<\/strong><\/td>\nohc<\/td>\n | Twin ohc<\/td>\n | ohc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nComp Ratio<\/strong><\/td>\n11:01<\/td>\n | N\/a<\/td>\n | 11:01<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nCarburettors<\/strong><\/td>\nTecalemit-Jacson fuel injection<\/td>\n | Tecalemit-Jacson fuel injection<\/td>\n | 2 x Weber of fuel injection<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nMax.Power<\/strong><\/td>\n172 bhp @ 6000 rpm<\/td>\n | 240 bhp @ 8000 rpm<\/td>\n | 195 bhp @ 7300 rpm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nTrans\/Gears<\/strong><\/td>\nHewland FT 200 [5]<\/td>\n | ZF 5 DS [5]<\/td>\n | Hewland FT 200 [5]<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Brakes<\/strong><\/td>\nGirling disc<\/td>\n | Girling disc 12″<\/td>\n | Girling Discs 10.25″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Brakes<\/strong><\/td>\nGirling disc<\/td>\n | Girling disc 12″<\/td>\n | Girling Discs 10.25″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSteering<\/strong><\/td>\nAlford & Adler Rack & pinion<\/td>\n | Rack & pinion<\/td>\n | Chevron\/Standard Triumph rack & pinion<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Susp’<\/strong><\/td>\nWishbone & coil springs<\/td>\n | Double wishbone & coils springs<\/td>\n | Wishbone & coils springs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Susp’<\/strong><\/td>\nLower wishbone, top links, twin r’rods c.s’<\/td>\n | Lower wishbone, top links, twin r’rods c.s’<\/td>\n | Lower wishbone, top links, twin r’rods c.s’<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nChassis<\/strong><\/td>\nSheet steel backbone<\/td>\n | Multi tubular space frame<\/td>\n | Tubular steel spaceframe with steel panels<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nWheel base<\/strong><\/td>\n7′-7″<\/td>\n | 7′-7″<\/td>\n | 7′-8″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Track<\/strong><\/td>\n4′-5″<\/td>\n | 4′-4″<\/td>\n | 4′-4″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Track<\/strong><\/td>\n4′-0.5″ approx.<\/td>\n | 4′-4″<\/td>\n | 4′-4″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nO’length<\/strong><\/td>\n13′-1.5″<\/td>\n | 12′-10″<\/td>\n | 13′-6″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nO’width.body<\/strong><\/td>\n5′-4″<\/td>\n | 5′-9″<\/td>\n | 5′-7″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nKerb weight<\/strong><\/td>\n1,342 lbs<\/td>\n | 1,250 lbs<\/td>\n | 1,265 lbs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Tyres<\/strong><\/td>\n5.50\/8.10 x 13″<\/td>\n | 12 x 15″<\/td>\n | 4.75 x 13″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Tyres<\/strong><\/td>\n6.00\/10.50 x 13″<\/td>\n | 15 x 15″<\/td>\n | 6.00 x 13″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSpecification<\/strong><\/td>\nGinetta G16A<\/strong><\/td>\nNomad -BRM Mk.2<\/strong><\/td>\nChevron B16<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nEngine \/Cyli<\/strong><\/td>\nV8 water cooled<\/td>\n | V8 water cooled<\/td>\n | Ford -Cosworth FVA four cylinder water cooled<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nBore \/Stroke<\/strong><\/td>\n73.28 x 59.18 mm<\/td>\n | 73.28 x 59.18 mm<\/td>\n | 85.7 x 69.1 mm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nCC<\/strong><\/td>\n1998 cc<\/td>\n | 1998 cc<\/td>\n | 1,594 cc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nValve Gear<\/strong><\/td>\nFour ohc<\/td>\n | Four ohc<\/td>\n | Twin ohc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nComp Ratio<\/strong><\/td>\n10.8:1<\/td>\n | 10.8:1<\/td>\n | 12:01<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nCarburettors<\/strong><\/td>\nLucas Fuel injection<\/td>\n | Lucas Fuel injection<\/td>\n | Lucas Fuel injection<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nMax.Power<\/strong><\/td>\n250 bhp @ 9000 rpm<\/td>\n | 250 bhp @ 9000 rpm<\/td>\n | 235 bhp @ 8500 rpm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nTrans\/Gears<\/strong><\/td>\nHewland [5]<\/td>\n | Hewland [5]<\/td>\n | Hewland FT 200 [5]<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Brakes<\/strong><\/td>\nDiscs<\/td>\n | Girling discs<\/td>\n | Girling discs 10.25″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Brakes<\/strong><\/td>\nDiscs<\/td>\n | Girling discs<\/td>\n | Girling Discs 10.25″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSteering<\/strong><\/td>\nRack & pinion<\/td>\n | Rack & pinion<\/td>\n | Rack 7 pinion<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Susp’<\/strong><\/td>\nDouble wishbone & coils springs<\/td>\n | Wishbones & coil springs<\/td>\n | Lower wishbone, top links, twin r’rods c.s’<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Susp’<\/strong><\/td>\nLower wishbone, top links, twin r’rods c.s’<\/td>\n | Lower wishbone, top links, twin r’rods c.s’<\/td>\n | Lower wishbone, top links, twin r’rods c.s’<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nChassis<\/strong><\/td>\nMulti tubular space frame<\/td>\n | Multi tubular space frame<\/td>\n | Multi tubular space frame with stressed steel under tray<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nWheel base<\/strong><\/td>\n7′-7″<\/td>\n | 7′-62 approx.<\/td>\n | 7′-9″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Track<\/strong><\/td>\n4′-4″ approx.<\/td>\n | 4′-7″<\/td>\n | 4′-3.5″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Track<\/strong><\/td>\n4′-4″ approx.<\/td>\n | 4′-7″<\/td>\n | 4′-3.5″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nO’length<\/strong><\/td>\n12′-00″<\/td>\n | 13′-7″<\/td>\n | N\/a<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nO’width.body<\/strong><\/td>\nN\/a<\/td>\n | 5′-10″<\/td>\n | N\/a<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nKerb weight<\/strong><\/td>\n1,180 lbs<\/td>\n | 1,635 lbs<\/td>\n | N\/a<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Tyres<\/strong><\/td>\nN\/a<\/td>\n | 10 x 15″<\/td>\n | 10 x 13″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Tyres<\/strong><\/td>\nN\/a<\/td>\n | 13 x 15″<\/td>\n | 14 x 13″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Twite observed:-<\/p>\n \u201cThe most notable feature of the car was its engine, a Lotus design based on the Vauxhall Victor 2litre block and no doubt the prototype of a forthcoming road going unit. Known as the LV\/220 [Lotus Vauxhall, 220 bhp minimum], the engine gave 240 bhp in racing trim and indeed has been renamed the LV\/240 for 1970″<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\nLearning Opportunities<\/strong><\/p>\nOur learning \/educational opportunities are intended to be challenging thought provoking and requiring additional research and\/or analysis.<\/p>\n These opportunities are particularly designed for a museum\/education centre location where visitors would be able to enjoy access to all the structured resources available in conjunction with any concurrent exhibition.<\/p>\n In this instance we suggest the following might be appropriate:-<\/p>\n \n- Examine sales volume for each type \u2013suggest explanation for variations<\/li>\n
- What were the contemporaries [see appendix below etc.]<\/li>\n
- Suggest an alternative design with broad framework technical specification<\/li>\n
- Examine and assess recent incarnation? Is it worthy successor? how does it compare<\/li>\n
- Debate \u201cbackbone\u201d chassis \u2013backbone product?<\/li>\n
- Compare and contrast Elan and Europa<\/li>\n
- Suggest an automobile product viability assessment \u2013see appendix below for guidance<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Exhibitions, Education and Economics<\/strong><\/p>\nIn the museum context the editors believe that commercial considerations are both necessary and complementary with its educational objectives.<\/p>\n For these reasons our suggested outline Business Plan includes provision for promoting products and services which share Chapman\u2019s ideals of mechanical efficiency and sustainability. In addition we propose merchandising that explain and interprets the social and cultural context of Chapman\u2019s designs in period. It\u2019s suggested there will be catalogue for on line purchasing. In this instance the following might be appropriate:-<\/p>\n \n\n\nLotus 47&62<\/td>\n | In the Group: Band of Brothers<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nLotus 47&62<\/td>\n | Group 4 : The Gold Leaf Team<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nLotus 47&62<\/td>\n | Group 4 : the class of ’68<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nLotus 47&62<\/td>\n | Group 4 : in the right company<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nLotus 47&62<\/td>\n | Group 4: Records & charts,& tracks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\nThe 47 and 62 are interesting in their commonality.<\/p>\n They played important roles within Lotus not least commercial.<\/p>\n They might be considered part of a family.They offered some economies and supported sales.<\/p>\n The type 47 was a good practical package. It was both quick and reliable. Produced in reasonable quantity to garner results in was competitive at club and international level.<\/p>\n The type 62 was valuable in accelerating Lotus engine development and its commercial dimension within the brand, reputation and independence.<\/p>\n The Lotus 62 therefore contributed to the engine that would power Lotus through the 70\u2019s and 80\u2019s and contribute to brand survival.<\/p>\n Appendix<\/strong><\/p>\nLotus Type 62: Specification from Twite<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nSpecification<\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nEngine \/Cyli<\/td>\n | 4 cylinder , water cooled<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nBore \/Stroke<\/td>\n | 95.3mm x 69.9 mm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nCC<\/td>\n | 1992 cc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nValve Gear<\/td>\n | Twin ohc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nComp Ratio<\/td>\n | n\/a<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nCarburettors<\/td>\n | Tecalemit Jackson fuel injection<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nMax.Power<\/td>\n | 240 bhp at 8,000 rpm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nTrans\/Gears<\/td>\n | 5 speed ZF 5DS 12 gearbox<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Brakes<\/td>\n | Girling discs 12 inch diameter<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Brakes<\/td>\n | Girling discs 12 inch diameter<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nSteering<\/td>\n | Rack and pinion<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Susp’<\/td>\n | Double wishbone and coil springs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Susp’<\/td>\n | Lower wishbones, top links, twin radius rods and coil springs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nChassis<\/td>\n | Multi-tubular spaceframe<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nWheel base<\/td>\n | 7ft-7 inch<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Track<\/td>\n | 4ft-4 inch<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Track<\/td>\n | 4ft-4 inch<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nO’length<\/td>\n | 12ft-10 inch<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nO’width.body<\/td>\n | 5ft-9 inch<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nKerb weight<\/td>\n | 1250 lbs.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nFront Tyres<\/td>\n | 15 x 12″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \nRear Tyres<\/td>\n | 15 x 15″<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Reference:<\/strong><\/p>\nMotor Road Tests 1972 Series.IPC.1972 [Test no. 53\/71 Lotus Europa Twin Cam]<\/p>\n Lotus: The Elite, \u00c9lan and Europa.Harvey.Oxford illustrated.1985.<\/p>\n ISBN: 0902280856<\/p>\n The World\u2019s Racing Cars.Twite.Macdonald.1971.<\/p>\n Classic sports cars.posthumus and Hodges. Ivy Leaf.1991.<\/p>\n ISBN: 0863630235<\/p>\n ISBN:<\/p>\n Please note the editors of the A&R attempt to give the broadest spectrum of references but not all are available for consultation in an article. However by noting their existence it may assist students in their research.<\/em><\/p>\n*Items in italics non A&R library books.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Introduction The types 47 and 62 are worthy of study. Neither massive competition successes but none the less important in Lotus development and in the commercially dimension of product development. The editors identify a link of commonality between these cars and we highlight it below. This article combines both the types 47 & 62 but […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":282,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.colinchapmanmuseum.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3214"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.colinchapmanmuseum.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.colinchapmanmuseum.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.colinchapmanmuseum.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.colinchapmanmuseum.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3214"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.colinchapmanmuseum.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3214\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3222,"href":"http:\/\/www.colinchapmanmuseum.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3214\/revisions\/3222"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.colinchapmanmuseum.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.colinchapmanmuseum.co.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}} | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |